Author Topic: Ignore this (Read 4829 times)

Pete · « **on:** May 30, 2013, 09:38:09 AM »

Daft question removed.

Scimitar · « **Reply #1 on:** May 30, 2013, 10:42:15 PM »

I refuse to ignore this until you explain fully, why, in your opinion, we should do so.
You can't just tell us to ignore nothing whatsoever - its not right.
I might have to report you to the Moderator for your " Ignore this-erance"

Pete · « **Reply #2 on:** May 30, 2013, 11:57:41 PM »

Do you want to pretend I'm interested in what you're saying?

Old Cruser · « **Reply #3 on:** May 31, 2013, 12:33:55 PM »

Ignore him Scimitar - he'll be on the wakky bakky again

Pete · « **Reply #4 on:** May 31, 2013, 01:27:32 PM »

This thread was to test a theory I'd read about - and Scimitar just proved the hypothesis.

Now, where can I get this wakky bakky from - sounds good to me!

Salvador Dali for Prime Minister!

Old Cruser · « **Reply #5 on:** May 31, 2013, 03:03:18 PM »

Well come on then Pete the Paint - share this theory. :?

Pete · « **Reply #6 on:** May 31, 2013, 03:08:15 PM »

It's complicated, so I'll simplify as best I can.

More people will click a button marked "Don't Press" than will press a button marked "Press This".

Old Cruser · « **Reply #7 on:** May 31, 2013, 03:10:59 PM »

Heyup - he finks ware fick now

Pete · « **Reply #8 on:** May 31, 2013, 03:15:07 PM »

Not at all.

If I told you the article was about self-honesty, and how people kid themselves knowing that they are kiding themselves and people who kid themselves but actually believe it.

Does that make sense?

Scimitar · « **Reply #9 on:** May 31, 2013, 03:40:44 PM »

Quote from: Pete on May 30, 2013, 11:57:41 PM

Do you want to pretend I'm interested in what you're saying?

Hey, I was only having a bit of fun, or so I thought. Your sense of humour seems to have been replaced by rudeness.
Still, its your little toy, and I guess you can say what you want at the risk of humiliating members.
Nuff said

Pete · « **Reply #10 on:** May 31, 2013, 04:08:12 PM »

My sense of humour is a little darker than you think - it was supposed to funny...

After a couple of humorous posts by you, I thought it would amuse you. Obviously I was wrong.

I apologise if you took offense - but if you joke with me I will joke with you. Don't think Morcambe and wise, think Frankie Boyle.

Scimitar · « **Reply #11 on:** May 31, 2013, 04:27:24 PM »

Apology accepted. I was told on my school report once that I had a weird sense of humour, so I guess we are both similar in that respect.
I misinterpreted you it seems - no damage done

Old Cruser · « **Reply #12 on:** May 31, 2013, 04:44:56 PM »

Yes I knew Pete was joking scimitar - it is the wakky bakky don't let him kid you it's not

Pete

I was also joking in my post - a bit of psychology in it - thats my interest - which is why I didn't initially respond to the initial post.
Interesting theory though - and very true

Fly · « **Reply #13 on:** May 31, 2013, 05:24:04 PM »

Quote from: Pete on May 31, 2013, 03:15:07 PM

Not at all.

If I told you the article was about self-honesty, and how people kid themselves knowing that they are kiding themselves and people who kid themselves but actually believe it.

Does that make sense?

Deffo wacky bacca. Surely if you believed it, you wouldn't know you were kidding yourself in the first place would you. And don't call me Shirley

Pete · « **Reply #14 on:** May 31, 2013, 05:47:41 PM »

>> Surely if you believed it, you wouldn't know you were kidding yourself

Nor so Flyboy - how many people think they are in with a chance on the National Lottery? Loads.

Yet it has been proven that the odds against winning the lottery are a lot less than being struck by lightning.

How many people worry about being struck by lightening? Not many.

We kid ourselves all the time one way or another.