[quote author=Old Cruser link=topic=6573.msg47056#msg47056 date=1579656964
I remember the times on the old steam trains to Blackpool from Chesterfield. It was lovely to sit back and watch the scenery.
[/quote]
Yes in those halcyon days of steam things did appear to go at a leisurely pace. Most people then only used the trains to go on holiday or day trips, very few {compared with today} needed a train to get to work. In some cases people only used them maybe once a year but the demand was so great it was a profitable business, yes it had it's faults, it wasn't perfect, and if the train did arrive at the destination 10 minutes late it was no big deal, but at least goods and people were kept moving. Then in the late 50's to late 60's people became more independent, they started buying cars which freed them up from railway timetables so broadened their horizons, more and more freight too started going by road as the motorways started to make an impact, so Beeching axed numerous railway stations obviously to cut costs and save money.
Unfortunately 30 odd years later it has gone full circle, the reliance on trains to get people to their place of work is phenomenal and in that time successive governments have failed to keep up with the demand. Grant Schapps {minister for transport} on breakfast t.v. this morning gave the viewer a classic lesson in how to evade awkward questions. It's always jam tomorrow with politicians, they honestly cannot understand why, when they announce all this spending and updating the railways, that it will take YEARS and YEARS. All the commuters cramped into ageing rolling stock having to stand all the way because there are not enough coaches on the train and they are constantly late for work want something doing NOW. It's no good telling commuters "Just hang on in there for another 15 years and we will have it sorted"